Linguistic ability is a prerequisite for reasoning skills, and neural processes have been evidenced in language learning as well as use. Human language processing can be viewed as human processing of information, where terms as a system, program, and option, though correlative with computer science, cannot imply close a correspondence, since natural language remains a scope of skill unmatched by artificial parsing. Human neurophysiology is the primary reference for the following discourse on the role of feedback in human language command.
Discourse on information processing requires terms as an option, a processing system, program, signal, and feedback. Human logical skill does not work in denial of the nervous system. The system is discussed as an information processing and managing structure, beginning with the single cell, and ending with the intricate connectedness of the human brain. Congruence averred in the above terms, feedback incidence shall be appreciated for a natural principle.
Regard to natural language acquisition and learning motivates a psychological meaning for feedback competence, described as the knowledge of behavior results to influence or modify further performance (Webster’s Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language, 1989). Knowledge can be defined as information gained via experience or study, the thesis framework is thus able to embrace the psychological reference.
Knowledge of result may correspond with returning of output, the thesis is yet to examine if human individuality would not impel a revision on feedback as a return to part own input. As build of neural patterns of behavioral validity, language acquisition is held for language learning. Closed-loop competence to be affirmed for all stages in linguistic progression, a term of human feedback strategy shall be proposed.